<img class="alignnone" src="http://stupid-studio.com/v1/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/gapingvoid.jpg" alt="" width="418" height="262" />
I am <a href="http://christopherwink.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/the-end-is-here-christopher-wink-joined-facebook/">new to Facebook</a> - though I have gotten on <a href="http://christopherwink.wordpress.com/2008/08/18/i-have-400-facebook-friends-what-ive-learned/">my hustle to maximize readership output</a> from it.
At the end of July,<a href="http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=23612952130"> the social networking giant announced a new version</a> they were rolling out. Since joining, I ignored the offer to voluntarily take it on - having found to like Facebook and heard rumors of the its next model falling short.
Well, on Wednesday night the trial ended, and I got the new version. Oh, the rumors are right - the new Facebook sucks. The social utility <a href="http://vanelsas.wordpress.com/2008/04/16/5-reasons-why-facebook-sucks/">gets criticized all the time, for things like</a> restricting user freedom, having once-revolutionary but now outdated news feeds, and its spam-like applications. Now it seems to have taken a step backwards.
<!--more-->
The most consistent criticism is <a href="http://www.justincox.com/2008/why-the-new-facebook-sucks/">how disorganized profile pages seem now</a> because of Facebook's attempt at the Web 2.0 feel of rounded edges and fewer borders. Their news feed got lamer and muddier, as pages were broken into various tabs.
There is also wide criticism of <a href="http://www.wearenotfreelancers.co.za/view_item.cfm/title/why_the_new_facebook_sucks">truly specific design flaws that go beyond me</a>.
<a href="http://www.stanleytang.com/2008/07/22/3-reasons-why-the-new-facebook-sucks/">Another critic rightly points</a><a href="http://www.stanleytang.com/2008/07/22/3-reasons-why-the-new-facebook-sucks/"> out that</a> Facebook seems to be taking on Twitter (<a href="http://www.twitter.com/christopherwink">follow me</a>) with a more dominant "What are you doing?" box and concurs about the loose-feel of pages. There also is a lot of criticism over<a href="http://www.justincox.com/2008/why-the-new-facebook-sucks/"> their use of white space</a>.
Best criticisms of new Facebook:
<a href="http://www.justincox.com/2008/why-the-new-facebook-sucks/">Justin Cox</a>
<a href="http://www.stanleytang.com/2008/07/22/3-reasons-why-the-new-facebook-sucks/">Stanley Tang</a>
<a href="http://www.wearenotfreelancers.co.za/view_item.cfm/title/why_the_new_facebook_sucks">We are not Freelancers</a>
<em>Image from <a href="http://stupid-studio.com/v1/?p=288">Stupid Studio</a>.</em>Last month marked three months since I started at nonprofit Back on My Feet and launched a concerted effort to share more member stories and help develop a better, broader online relationship with our volunteers, members and supporters.
The first step in that process was to reawaken our social media accounts — the best platforms to create Web communities and ones buttressed by an organizational blog that I hope to more formally announce soon. Because our organization is all about accountability, we wanted to see how we’ve done.
I thought some lessons or benchmarks might be able to be garnered for others interested in social media use by nonprofits or other organizations, so I’ll share our progress below.
Continue reading Three months of social media growth for nonprofit Back on My Feet







The frequent mention of market dominance is
I have submitted a story or post of mine to Digg three times in a half-year of membership.